Texas Gun Forum

EVERYTHING ELSE => Off Topic Discussion (NON FIREARM RELATED) => Topic started by: Alte Schule on September 18, 2020, 06:44:10 PM

Title: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 18, 2020, 06:44:10 PM
With her death this election is going to turn into a cut throat madhouse.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: plinkr on September 18, 2020, 07:45:46 PM
Why? I expect to see a new justice seated in two weeks.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 18, 2020, 08:06:30 PM
Democrats aren’t going to go away easy. Kavenaugh’s nomination will pale in comparison. Senator Murcowski and Lindsey have stated over the last year that they wouldn’t vote for a SC nominee prior to the election and Romney is as always questionable.

Hopefully your right but it ain’t going to be easy. Schumer, Schiff and Pelosi will pull out all the dirty tricks. I predict violence in the streets, a march on Capitol Building by both leftists and conservatives, a sheetstorm is coming.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 18, 2020, 09:17:43 PM
Now we get to see if Mitch McConnell is an AMERICAN, or part of the back stabbing swamp. 

They have 6 weeks.

My vote is for Ted Cruz. We need a constitutional lawyer, and Cruz also has SCOTUS experience.

We need quick and easy with no skeletons.

Republicans need to cram this through FAST.

Because the dems will sue and contest the election no matter what.

We cant have a 4 x 4 split.

We need that 5th vote.

You better believe dems would ram one through if they had the chance.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 18, 2020, 11:56:04 PM
Now we get to see if Mitch McConnell is an AMERICAN, or part of the back stabbing swamp. 

They have 6 weeks.

My vote is for Ted Cruz. We need a constitutional lawyer, and Cruz also has SCOTUS experience.

We need quick and easy with no skeletons.

Republicans need to cram this through FAST.

Because the dems will sue and contest the election no matter what.

We cant have a 4 x 4 split.

We need that 5th vote.

You better believe dems would ram one through if they had the chance.

I would love to see Cruz sitting on the SC bench, but he said four days ago it wasn't happening. He even discussed it several months ago on his podcast he wasn't interested in sitting as justice on the SC.

The next couple of weeks are going to be very interesting to say the least.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 19, 2020, 12:45:28 AM
I really dont know the other nominee list as good as I probably  should.

I know many texans dont want to loose Cruz.

I do feel we need a proven constitutionalists. 

But McConnell said tonight if Trump puts a nominee forward, they WILL VOTE on it before the election.

I'll bet the liberal Democrats is  hair is on fire this weekend.  :th_thicon_lol: :th_thicon_lol:

We might just save AMERICA after all.

With another justice, Democrats have ZERO hope of getting a winning vote on their voter fraud scheme contested election plans.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 19, 2020, 11:04:21 AM
One of the names being mentioned as a possible replacement is a lady named Amy Coney Barrett. Don't know anything about her.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 19, 2020, 11:12:08 AM
Here's my thoughts as well on the vacancy they now have. RBG has been in poor health for some time now. I think many knew it was just a matter of time before she passed, or possibly retired.

So I think it's very possible that Trump and others had already had some ideas as to a replacement for RBG in the event she did vacate her seat on the SC. There were probably already some plans they had to deal with this in the event of her death.

I can't imagine they would leave something as important as a vacant SC seat being left to chance.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 19, 2020, 11:15:07 AM
One of the names being mentioned as a possible replacement is a lady named Amy Coney Barrett. Don't know anything about her.
Catholic, rabid pro life, seven kids, sits on the 7th Dist. Court of appeals. Was on the short list when kavenaugh got the nod.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 19, 2020, 11:22:57 AM
I looked up barrett last night.

She had some issues with me.

As a catholic, she is against the death penalty,  and wrote papers on judges recusing themselves from those case,

But the gave the deciding vote on the 1st federal execution in 17 years.

She is pro 2A,

So much , she seems to think convicted felons should be allowed to own and carry a firearm. And said prohibiting felons from firearms is a violation of THEIR RIGHTS.

Felons give up that RIGHT, choosing to be a criminal IMO. The constitution dont much apply to career criminals imo.

That's for LAW ABIDING CITIZENS IMO.

She said Roe v  wade can stand, the real question is using public funds to pay for it.

Her history seems well, WISHY WASHY.

She waffles on stuff.

For a 48 year old, that's troubling.
She will have 40+ years on the bench to get much worse imo. Or better. But it's a big unknown imo.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 19, 2020, 11:29:21 AM
Here's my thoughts as well on the vacancy they now have. RBG has been in poor health for some time now. I think many knew it was just a matter of time before she passed, or possibly retired.

So I think it's very possible that Trump and others had already had some ideas as to a replacement for RBG in the event she did vacate her seat on the SC. There were probably already some plans they had to deal with this in the event of her death.

I can't imagine they would leave something as important as a vacant SC seat being left to chance.
Trump put out a list of possible nominees last week and challenged Biden to do the same. He refused but he will probably have to do something now. One of the rumors last night was Trump had inside info that Ginsburg was on her death bed thus the reason for releasing his list. Don’t know if that’s true as he looked genuinely shocked when they told him after the rally last night.
One thing for sure the next six weeks is going to be interesting. I bet Trump comes out with a name early next week and gets the ball rolling. I’m guessing Cruz would have to resign from the senate if he’s nominated as he can’t vote for himself but I could be wrong. Gov Abbott would fill the seat real quick with another staunch conservative if it came to that.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 19, 2020, 11:35:30 AM
The good thing about barret is confirmation is practically assured.

Dems cant do much but bitch about her religion, which is what they did last time. That's actually illegal for Congress to consider or bring that up in hearings, as per no judge shall be questioned on their religious preference and shall have no bearing on confirmation. 

Feinstein did it anyway. But if not for that, the Democrats had nothing.

I dont know about  abbot either.

But whoever it is, better be squeaky clean with no skeletons. That could derail the whole thing.

We need to get this done BEFORE the election.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 19, 2020, 11:46:10 AM
I looked up barrett last night.

She had some issues with me.

As a catholic, she is against the death penalty,  and wrote papers on judges recusing themselves from those case,

But the gave the deciding vote on the 1st federal execution in 17 years.

She is pro 2A,

So much , she seems to think convicted felons should be allowed to own and carry a firearm. And said prohibiting felons from firearms is a violation of THEIR RIGHTS.

Felons give up that RIGHT, choosing to be a criminal IMO. The constitution dont much apply to career criminals imo.

That's for LAW ABIDING CITIZENS IMO.

She said Roe v  wade can stand, the real question is using public funds to pay for it.

Her history seems well, WISHY WASHY.

She waffles on stuff.

For a 48 year old, that's troubling.
She will have 40+ years on the bench to get much worse imo. Or better. But it's a big unknown imo.
I would take her over ANY green initiative, anti fracking, anti 2A pro choice progressive. I probably will find something about any Trump nominee that I don’t like. Like with Kavenaugh being a beer drinking college student frat boy.I mean who could put up with such shenanigans? I got on my high horse and overlooked his faults.

Just a little leg pull.  :thumbsup1:
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 19, 2020, 11:48:50 AM
I looked up barrett last night.

She had some issues with me.

As a catholic, she is against the death penalty,  and wrote papers on judges recusing themselves from those case,

But the gave the deciding vote on the 1st federal execution in 17 years.

She is pro 2A,

So much , she seems to think convicted felons should be allowed to own and carry a firearm. And said prohibiting felons from firearms is a violation of THEIR RIGHTS.

Felons give up that RIGHT, choosing to be a criminal IMO. The constitution dont much apply to career criminals imo.

That's for LAW ABIDING CITIZENS IMO.

She said Roe v  wade can stand, the real question is using public funds to pay for it.

Her history seems well, WISHY WASHY.

She waffles on stuff.

For a 48 year old, that's troubling.
She will have 40+ years on the bench to get much worse imo. Or better. But it's a big unknown imo.

Personally, I'm not opposed to ex-felons regaining the right to own and possess firearms, IF they have served their entire sentence, or after their parole has expired. At such point IMO, they have repaid their debt to society, and should regain the right to protect and defend themselves.

If they are so dangerous to society, that they can't be trusted to be in possession of a firearm, should they be allowed to be out of prison in the first place?

Personally, I can't disagree with her position on that issue.

The abortion issue will always be a very contentious subject. But IMO, that should be a private matter between a woman, her doctor and God. I am for the most part very much pro-life and against abortion, but it should never be funded with any type of government or taxpayer funds in any manner. The funding should be strictly private means sourced.

Her being Catholic isn't, or shouldn't be an issue either. It doesn't an issue for me, or concern me.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 19, 2020, 11:56:14 AM
The good thing about barret is confirmation is practically assured.

Dems cant do much but bitch about her religion, which is what they did last time. That's actually illegal for Congress to consider or bring that up in hearings, as per no judge shall be questioned on their religious preference and shall have no bearing on confirmation. 

Feinstein did it anyway. But if not for that, the Democrats had nothing.

I dont know about  abbot either.




But whoever it is, better be squeaky clean with no skeletons. That could derail the whole thing.

We need to get this done BEFORE the election.
I was referring to Gov Abbott of Texas. He would have to appoint someone to fill Cruz’s vacant senate seat should Cruz be nominated or confirmed. Gov Abbott is a died in the wool conservative whoever he appoints will be pro 2A.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 19, 2020, 11:59:13 AM
The good thing about barret is confirmation is practically assured.

Dems cant do much but bitch about her religion, which is what they did last time. That's actually illegal for Congress to consider or bring that up in hearings, as per no judge shall be questioned on their religious preference and shall have no bearing on confirmation. 

Feinstein did it anyway. But if not for that, the Democrats had nothing.

I dont know about  abbot either.




But whoever it is, better be squeaky clean with no skeletons. That could derail the whole thing.

We need to get this done BEFORE the election.
I was referring to Gov Abbott of Texas. He would have to appoint someone to fill Cruz’s vacant senate seat should Cruz be nominated or confirmed. Gov Abbott is a died in the wool conservative whoever he appoints will be pro 2A.

Cruz would make an excellent SC justice IMO as well. But from what I have gathered from his own mouth, he's not interested in the least in being nominated or even considered to be nominated.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Shield45 on September 19, 2020, 12:05:13 PM
To me depends upon the felony crime committed originally.

Some violent type offenses no they should not ever be reinstated as far as gun ownership.
Right to vote etc Im good with as stated after all conditions meant etc they are a ok.

My daughter was involved in bad things as a younger persons she is now 37 and has recently received her right to firearms back as a result of many yrs of rehab and hoop jumping.
Her original drug related offense was non violent and as such I agree.

Had the offense been other I may not feel the same (blood feelings aside).

She worked hard did everything required on or before time given.

She is now well away from her past and has a great husband who basically saw her through it all and treats her like a queen.

People make mistakes and can learn and grow from them.

RGB was a great legal mind and I do believe for the most part she tried to rule on law not feelings or emotions which is a judges duty.

The SCOTUS has been far to politicized for many many years. The elected bodies in DC need to make the laws the court needs to uphold them not create them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 19, 2020, 01:05:51 PM
I agree with everyone on the felony firearms thing.

That's why I said CAREER criminals.

I know its splitting hairs.

But I also think A non  violent 1 time  FELONY should be looked at differently, from even a non violent career criminal.

There needs to be some line in the sand there.

Like even for non violent, 3 strikes your out deal.

The constitution was not written for career criminals imo. . Its basis is law abiding citizens.

But again, barrett seems to waffle on things.

That could turn into another Robert's thing in the next 40 years.

But barrett would likely be a shoe in.

Democrats found NOTHING on her last go around, so they resorted to attacking her religion.

And 4 Democrats even voted for barret.

If Robert's did Indeed hit Epstein island, I do look for that to force him to resign next Trump term.

Trump himself said he has learned some people in the swamp are untouchable.

But barr can only pander so long. And he has wore it about as thin as Patriots are going to allow. We all know he is also foot dragging until the election.

Giving us one indicted low level lawyer who is still running free wont hold very long.

But back to the hair splitting.

Barret somewhat concerns me, but might be the shoe in. And that might be best, since a prolonged fight could derail the whole thing.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 19, 2020, 05:25:07 PM
I just got off the phone with a liberal.

She didnt call me yesterday. And I knew why.

And when she called today, I also knew why.

To bitch.

I ask her 3 times to not go there, but she insisted, so I pist  in her corn flakes.  :P

She was raising hell about how without Ginsburg's vote, the Democrats will loose their planned contested election JUST LIKE IN 2000.  She was pretty triggered.

Tell me that wasnt their plan all along. Screw up the election. As bad as possible with fake mail In ballots, then file suit and get a 5/4 scotus vote.

They were so certain this would remove trump.

Every point she had  was right from CNN.

Then when she started raising hell about how trump is a dictator and how they NEVER EVER  elect a SCOTUS before an election,

I informed her that Ginsburg was nominated by Clinton with 46 days left before the election.


She hung up.  :th_thicon_lol:

Liberals are really having a BAD BAD WEEKEND.  :th_KO: :th_nuts: :help:  :bangheadonwall: :scream3: :scream3: :scream3:

The incredible part is how mad they are at ruth.
I'm mean they're flat out  m  f  ing ruth for dying.

Like I'm sure she planned this just to offend liberals.  right?  :bangheadonwall:

I think where ruth screwed up was they were so positive hiliary was winning, she stayed in.

OOPS!
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: AKM-47 on September 19, 2020, 05:26:54 PM
Just saw a pole on KHOU 13 news asking if they should wait until after the election to nominate someone

76% NO    24%  YES

Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 19, 2020, 05:32:12 PM
Both Trump and McConnell  said again today they are doing it.  :thumbsup1:
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 19, 2020, 08:18:58 PM
Trump said tonight at a rally in North Carolina that it will be a woman and and he will announce it next week. The talking heads on Fox are betting on Barrett.Married 18 years,  Five kids, two adopted black kids, one with disabilities, Catholic and Pro Life. When she was vetted previously all Feinstein and the Dems were harping was on her religion interfering with the interpretation of the law.

Next six weeks will be interesting.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Shield45 on September 19, 2020, 09:54:41 PM
Trump said tonight at a rally in North Carolina that it will be a woman and and he will announce it next week. The talking heads on Fox are betting on Barrett.Married 18 years,  Five kids, two adopted black kids, one with disabilities, Catholic and Pro Life. When she was vetted previously all Feinstein and the Dems were harping was on her religion interfering with the interpretation of the law.

Next six weeks will be interesting.
Heck if one is trans as well she will please even the libs.

Dont see what ones religious leanings have to do with interpreting law.

 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 19, 2020, 10:47:20 PM
Religion should not have any bearing on judicial nominees but, unfortunately, it does to the Democrats. When Trump nominated her to the 7th court of appeals Feinstein grilled her butt about being Catholic and pro life and was pretty nasty about it.
I don’t care if someone worships a dead rat it ain’t none of my business.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: AKM-47 on September 19, 2020, 11:55:10 PM
Trump said tonight at a rally in North Carolina that it will be a woman and and he will announce it next week. The talking heads on Fox are betting on Barrett.Married 18 years,  Five kids, two adopted black kids, one with disabilities, Catholic and Pro Life. When she was vetted previously all Feinstein and the Dems were harping was on her religion interfering with the interpretation of the law.

Next six weeks will be interesting.
Dont see what ones religious leanings have to do with interpreting law.

 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She is holy, they are unholy
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 20, 2020, 02:13:07 AM
After looking at trumps list of women, barrett is the best choice imo.

Barrett is spotless clean, has a track record, SCOTUS experience, and NOT part of the swamp. 2A = 110%.

Her worst failing was she waffled on the death penalty.  She also believes the federal government should NOT be paying for abortions.

I wonder how some even made the list.

They are too young, zero experience, soft on illegals and immigration. Or too old and literally part of the swamp.

There is actually a rule that says Congress cannot even ask about religious beliefs during a nomination hearing.

But Feinstein  like ALL Democrats, are above the rules.

It looks to me like barrett is the best choice if they go with a woman.
And she should be a shoe in. So quick and easy.

Barrett also had 4 Democrats vote for her last time, when Pelosi and feinstein were rabidly  against barrett. So barrett might get a few dem votes which would just sink the dems and screw Romney and Collins.

We cant screw this up. It definitely needs done before the election. In barrets case, mitch might just nuke it. (If that applies)

I dont see how dems can really stop it.

Most  of the other females on the list  were pretty bad. They had many proven problems.

So at this point, I hope its barrett.

Dems hate her,  so that's as good a reason as any.  :thumbsup1:
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Shipwreck on September 20, 2020, 11:53:21 AM
Look at this:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-doesnt-rule-out-using-impeachment-as-option-to-stop-trump-supreme-court-pick
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: AKM-47 on September 20, 2020, 12:34:46 PM
What are the odds of the Democrats being successful  :bangheadonwall:
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on September 20, 2020, 12:42:49 PM
Look at this:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-doesnt-rule-out-using-impeachment-as-option-to-stop-trump-supreme-court-pick
There is nothing the dems can do to stop Trump from naming a Supreme Court nominee nor can they stop the senate from taking the nomination to the floor for a vote. The only thing that can stop the Republicans is the Republicans.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 20, 2020, 12:44:47 PM
Look at this:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-doesnt-rule-out-using-impeachment-as-option-to-stop-trump-supreme-court-pick

At this point. I'm sure the crazy radical Democrats will try ANYTHING.

The way Pelosi is running her mouth, I think SHE needs to be the one hiding in her basement. She is so unhinged she thinks SHE is immune from ANYTHING.

They are STILL trying to overthrow a sitting elected President. 

Their  TREASON must be answered for .

Look what these radical bass turds have done to OUR country this year.  :facepalm: :thumbsdown:

All controlled by a couple crooked politicians in CA and NY.

And now they are threatening to do even MORE?

Wow. Just wow.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 20, 2020, 12:47:42 PM
RBG dying Friday threw the proverbial monkey wrench into the Democrats plans of messing with the election!

They are scrambling to figure out how to get past it. They are going to do whatever, no matter how futile it may be to mess with the election.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 20, 2020, 12:56:30 PM
Look at this:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-doesnt-rule-out-using-impeachment-as-option-to-stop-trump-supreme-court-pick

Nancy Pelosi is a drunken idiot!  This comment!

 Pelosi said. “This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election.”

Seems as the Democrats are the one pushing not to accept the election results. Hillary said this.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/25/hillary-clinton-joe-biden-election-advice-401641
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: TXAZ on September 20, 2020, 02:15:21 PM
Look at this:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-doesnt-rule-out-using-impeachment-as-option-to-stop-trump-supreme-court-pick

Nancy Pelosi is a drunken idiot!  This comment!

 Pelosi said. “This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election.”

Seems as the Democrats are the one pushing not to accept the election results. Hillary said this.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/25/hillary-clinton-joe-biden-election-advice-401641

I strongly disagree.
She is a cold blooded politician for whom the truth is immaterial, yet she is a most effective dictator of Democrats by harshly punishing those who cross her.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 20, 2020, 08:01:17 PM
Look at this:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-doesnt-rule-out-using-impeachment-as-option-to-stop-trump-supreme-court-pick

Nancy Pelosi is a drunken idiot!  This comment!

 Pelosi said. “This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election.”

Seems as the Democrats are the one pushing not to accept the election results. Hillary said this.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/25/hillary-clinton-joe-biden-election-advice-401641

I strongly disagree.
She is a cold blooded politician for whom the truth is immaterial, yet she is a most effective dictator of Democrats by harshly punishing those who cross her.

Personally, and excuse my French, but she's a cold-hearted power hungry B***h!
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: TXAZ on September 20, 2020, 09:29:20 PM
...
Personally, and excuse my French, but she's a cold-hearted power hungry B***h!

That would be "chienne" in French Axxe.  :)  And I'd agree.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: TXAZ on September 20, 2020, 10:35:22 PM
Actually Axxe, I just saw this on urban dictionary that fits miss Nancy- pants to a T:

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cuntr&defid=11417754
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 21, 2020, 01:04:34 PM
Actually Axxe, I just saw this on urban dictionary that fits miss Nancy- pants to a T:

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cuntr&defid=11417754

I actually really detest that particular word, but in the case of Pelosi, just like my first ex-wife, I can make an exception! That word describes the most vile, and least possible affliction of being a female of our species. It does fit Nancy quite well.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: TXAZ on September 21, 2020, 01:52:59 PM
It is an acronym, is gender neutral, and unrelated to The 4 letter version.

Conversely, the fact it sounds like ‘that word’ only heightens the negative sentiment.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 21, 2020, 02:42:14 PM
Well, if the shoe fits.  :thumbsup1:
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: AKM-47 on September 24, 2020, 12:27:49 PM
Opinion....

I have been hearing that the nomination going through now will/can back fire on Trump

Communist propaganda or real chance.... what do you think


Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Shield45 on September 24, 2020, 12:55:51 PM
Opinion....

I have been hearing that the nomination going through now will/can back fire on Trump

Communist propaganda or real chance.... what do you think
Commie prop.
If the shoe was on the other foot they would be pushing it through guaranteed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: DCD327 on September 24, 2020, 01:13:00 PM
At this point, what can Democrats possibly  threaten Americans with ?

More rioting? More looting?

Democrats are planning their 2nd coup attempt, the biggest voter fraud scheme in history, and were counting on Ginsburg for a 5/4  vote on a contested election to oust trump.

WHAT can they possibly threaten us with?

We need a new scotus BEFORE the election.

With that appointment, Democrats are sunk.

So we also need a nominee that will pass nomination.

Imo, that is barrett. I think she may be the only one on the list that will pass muster and get the votes.

Lagoa is a Clinton connected, pro illegal alien, pro immigration, zero conservative record, minimal experience. She also represents illegal aliens for free when they sue OUR courts.

Democrats and rinos WANT lagoa.

Lagoa IS ALREADY part of the swamp imo.

2020. The year Democrats committed TREASON twice and nothing was done about it by the FBI, DOJ. Or GOP.   

I think mcconnel should skip the hearings as barret was just smeared by Feinstein in 2017 for being a christain.

Nominate her and vote.

The Cavanaugh smear campaign just disqualified Democrats from having the option of interviewing the nominee.

Nominate her and vote.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Axxe55 on September 24, 2020, 01:26:35 PM
Opinion....

I have been hearing that the nomination going through now will/can back fire on Trump

Communist propaganda or real chance.... what do you think

Unless there is something dark and sinister that we aren't seeing, I don't see how it could backfire and hurt Trump.

I'd go with commie propaganda too.

Just curious, exactly why are they saying it could backfire on Trump? I'd like to see the reasoning behind why anyone would think that.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: AKM-47 on September 24, 2020, 01:55:08 PM
Opinion....

I have been hearing that the nomination going through now will/can back fire on Trump

Communist propaganda or real chance.... what do you think

Unless there is something dark and sinister that we aren't seeing, I don't see how it could backfire and hurt Trump.

I'd go with commie propaganda too.

Just curious, exactly why are they saying it could backfire on Trump? I'd like to see the reasoning behind why anyone would think that.

I have been seeing comments from news articles, forums, a few people have even emailed me telling me they have seen people (on facebook) saying don't worry it's going to backfire on Trump and it's been heavy

Do they know something we don't or are they that stupid


Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Shield45 on September 24, 2020, 03:20:23 PM
Opinion....

I have been hearing that the nomination going through now will/can back fire on Trump

Communist propaganda or real chance.... what do you think

Unless there is something dark and sinister that we aren't seeing, I don't see how it could backfire and hurt Trump.

I'd go with commie propaganda too.

Just curious, exactly why are they saying it could backfire on Trump? I'd like to see the reasoning behind why anyone would think that.

Ilemailed me telling me they have seen people (on facebook) saying don't worry it's going to backfire on Trump and it's been heavy

Do they know something we don't or are they that stupid.

The two words in parenthesis is all I need to see to know you answered your own ? 

They are THAT stupid.

 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: AKM-47 on October 01, 2020, 06:41:51 PM
When are they going to vote on Amy Barrett

The sooner the better

Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on October 01, 2020, 08:56:12 PM
Senate Judiciary hearings begin on 10/12. That circus is expected to take three or days. Confirmation vote will come after that probably the following week but definitely before Election Day.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Alte Schule on October 01, 2020, 09:19:45 PM
Senate Judiciary hearings begin on 10/12. That circus is expected to take three or four days. Confirmation vote will come after that probably the following week but definitely before Election Day.
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Billy Gruber on October 09, 2020, 10:22:35 AM
From the 20th Amendment of The United States Constitution:

The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.

In my opinion POTUS is allowed by the constitution to execute his powers throughout his entire term, and he would be derelict in his duties if not proceeding with the wishes of those who elected him into office in 2016.  He was sworn in on January 20th, 2017 and his term runs through to January 20th, 2021.  He may be a lame duck with respect to dealing with the legislature, but that is not the case with the judicial branch of government.  The People voted in a Republican senate and president in 2016 and did so for four full years, nothing less.  The Democrats can drag it out to past the election just as long as she's voted in by January 20th, 2021. 
Title: Re: R.B. Ginsburg
Post by: Billy Gruber on October 09, 2020, 10:36:51 AM

The incredible part is how mad they are at ruth.
I'm mean they're flat out  m  f  ing ruth for dying.

Like I'm sure she planned this just to offend liberals.  right?  :bangheadonwall:

I think where ruth screwed up was they were so positive hiliary was winning, she stayed in.

OOPS!


Like they say...God works in mysterious ways.